NO Conflict is an Island

Emma Jenkings • 20 January 2025

The impact of workplace conflict on the wider organisation. (And vice-versa)

No Conflict is an Island

I love the poem by John Dunne, ‘No Man is an Island’ (1624). The first stanza says this:

No man is an island,

Entire of itself;

Every man is a piece of the continent,

A part of the main.

 

The poem in its entirety seems to be a commentary on death and the interconnectedness of humanity. When I am brought in to mediate a workplace dispute between colleagues, I often have the phrase in my mind, directly inspired by the above poem, ‘No conflict is an island’.


What happens to a few individuals affects the team and the wider organisation. And, most issues are not instantaneously ignited – there is often a build-up, and multiple factors will have influenced the interaction happening as it did.


As an example, colleagues may be working on a project together and end up arguing. Yes, it maybe that the biggest contributor to the dispute is miscommunication, but what led to that?

a)     What is the history of their relationship or with that type of task?

b)     What reputation does each of them have that may have influenced their perspective? What have they seen – or, what have people told them - about the other person?

c)     What other elements are involved in the project… timescales, task management, changes, client input, management direction, mistakes, commercial factors, organisational change, differing priorities, etc.? How might this have affected the interaction?

d)     What other responsibilities do they bear at work? What mental, physical or emotional capacity do they believe they have?

e)     What other elements are impacting the individuals? What is happening with their family or social circle? How is their home life? Other influencing factors might include health or finance concerns, or concerns about loved ones.

f)       What has their experience of conflict been – from childhood or as an adult?


There is so much that could have a part to play in the scenario that ends up happening. It is only the extremely rare case that involves two unkind people who ‘need their heads banging together’ – don’t get me started on that phrase!


When conflict happens, it is not taking place on an island, unaffected by what is happening on the 'mainland' – whether that involves home circumstances, work life, or a mixture of the two. Also, consider the unique frames of reference each person relies on – often subconsciously - that influence their perception of the other person and their behaviour.


I am regularly reminded of the particular influence line managers have on the escalation or effective and speedy resolution of an issue. I have lost count of how many times the action or inaction of a manager has resulted in an added complexity or the breakdown in relationship being unnecessarily sustained. Thankfully, I have also seen the positive impact of a line manager or senior leader in tackling issues or bringing the situation to me before escalation happens.


And, just as the build-up to a dispute or fall-out involves many external factors, the conflict similarly has an impact on other people and elements outside of the core dispute.


People know.


Colleagues can spot when there is friction happening between people – unless the individuals are incredibly intentional in their behaviours and self-aware, and all matters have occurred privately. Family members can sense tension between couples, and friends notice a change in communication.


They may not always know why it is happening or feel it is their place to ask questions, but people know.


As soon as other people know, it affects how they interact with the individuals concerned and their perception of an event – “Clearly, A doesn’t like B, and that is why they said ‘no’ to their request”. The narrative from this perception can start with pockets of assumption and gossip but easily develops into misinformation being communicated as fact.


Clients are impacted by the conflict too. They may not see the interactions day-to-day (though in some industries, they might!), but the natural consequence of conflict between colleagues leads to a difference in how they communicate, work with each other, and it often becomes a distraction from tasks, productivity, and a positive team atmosphere.


From my experience, people with ongoing frustrations tend to:

  • Avoid the other person.
  • This often creates challenges for typical working arrangements – impacting both the colleagues involved in the process and the productivity levels or standards.
  • Look out for the negatives and minimise the positives of the individual.
  • This clearly skews the feedback they give and develops an even more negative narrative of the person and the situation.
  • Feel ‘stuck’ in the situation.
  • This belief inevitably impacts their overall mindset about their work and abilities – either acting more impulsively or with undue caution.
  • Have a lower capacity for stress (because capacity is already taken due to the situation)
  • This affects how they perform, manage tasks, and tackle challenges or change.
  • Feel differently about the organisation.
  • Depending on how proactive, supportive and wisely an organisation acts, the individuals involved will either feel more engaged with the organisation OR develop feelings of frustration, hurt, or betrayal even.


The latter consequence of ongoing conflict without effective resolution is unfortunately the one that many organisations do not anticipate. Sometimes, I will mediate in a situation where the parties are able to move forward in their relationship, but they are left with very negative feelings towards their employer due to perhaps perceived delays, inaction, or mishandling of the situation.


I find it incredibly refreshing and encouraging when I am engaged by an organisation who proactively seeks out any feedback from the parties or my insight from the process – within the constraints of the mediation confidentiality principle – so they feel better equipped to support the individuals and reduce the likelihood of unnecessary conflict or escalation arising again.


Whether people are experiencing seemingly minor communication issues or total relationship breakdown, there is a knock-on effect. Before falling into the false belief that it happened on its own or is not affecting anyone but them, remember, that ‘No conflict is an island’.


Do you have a situation developing in your workplace, but you are not sure which solution is required, book a Consultation Call to discuss the situation and explore which option/s are right for your unique situation. Or you can enquire by emailing enquiries@mosaicmediation.co.uk .

Man looking at a script. Title is 'Difficult Conversations: Should you rehearse first?'
by Emma Jenkings 2 September 2026
We hear it all the time... "the younger generations won't speak on the phone" . (Although, in fairness, I know many an adult across different generations who also avoid phone conversations if they possibly can.) With teenagers of my own, I have thought about this and how far I want to push them to do something that feels uncomfortable. As a SEND mediator, in addition to my workplace mediation practice, I am also very aware that for many young people, the aversion to telephone calls goes beyond slight discomfort requiring upskilling or a confidence boost. I see the benefit of 'live' conversations though. That, unlike with messaging or emails, the speaker has a greater opportunity to convey their intentions and feelings using their tone of voice - body language adds to the communication if involving a videocall or in-person conversation. In my mediator role, I so frequently see small misunderstandings take place that lead to big issues, so anything which lessens the likelihood of that is a positive in my book. Telephone calls are like difficult conversations - people just don't want to have them! Difficult conversations are often avoided because people don't like tension. But, another reason difficult conversations are avoided, just as with telephone calls, is because people are not sure what they will say. Someone may even have tried to hold a tricky yet essential conversation in the past but got thrown off by an unexpected question or response from the other person. Then, this past experience makes them reluctant to go through a similar experience again. The tip I give out the most when people go through coaching due to wanting to be more confident and effective at holding difficult conversations is to prepare for it . Most people need some practice to feel confident on the phone. And in the majority of employed roles that involve a lot of telephone use, a company would provide a script so that any client receives a similar experience, regardless of which individual employee answers the phone. However, some might be concerned that a scripted conversation is likely to feel disingenuous. So, is there anything wrong with rehearsing a conversation beforehand? The last few months, I have done a lot of rehearsing! At the end of this week, I will be delivering my first TedX talk and one of the big challenges with speaking at a 🔴TedX event is to deliver the message without any notes. So, I have been memorising and memorising constantly. At one point, I had done really well at remembering the lines but realised that it sounded 'wooden' and unnatural. I had to take a moment to remember the purpose of what I was saying and how I felt when I first wrote the talk. There is a need - as with many scenarios - to strike a balance between seeming sincere whilst being prepared for a difficult conversation. Depending on the complexity of the conversation, you may find it helpful to prepare in greater detail for that conversation. (You can make use of this planning sheet as a resource . ) There are a few simple principles to consider when preparing for a conversation, so that it comes across as genuine and prepared: Work your way backwards - Take time before the conversation to consider what you want the other person to have heard when they leave. And, what do you want them to do with what they heard? Consider the where, when and how - Timing and context matters. Try to hold a sensitive conversation in a busy place and in a rush and you are unlikely to get a measured response. Have something 'up your sleeve' - Consider a few phrases that you can use during the conversation if you need to pause and process, or if you don't have an answer to a question they ask. This is also potentially helpful if you are going into a conversation with someone who has a particularly authoritative or aggressive communication style; meaning you may need to set boundaries. It is really beneficial to feel confident and clear - and also be genuine - when entering a potentially awkward or difficult conversation. Rehearsal for different outcomes can certainly help with that, especially if you can do that with a someone experienced with navigating such interactions. Simply working through the above three principles means you are likely to feel more prepared regarding what you would like to say, but also how to navigate the conversation when the other person responds too. If you would like coaching support to become a more effective communicator or to manage conflict with confidence, send Mosaic Mediation a message . Emma Jenkings is an accredited mediator, conflict and Peaceful Leadership coach, DISC practitioner, and mediator mentor. You can email any questions or queries to enquiries@mosaicmediation.co.uk .
'Flipping the Drama Triangle' - article by Emma Jenkings, Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 8 July 2026
Find out how the drama triangle roles show up in different scenarios – including the workplace - and how to break out of the roles that lead to conflict escalation.
'Keyboard Chaos: Problematic Communication'. Image: Hand typing on a keyboard.
by Emma Jenkings 18 May 2026
Written communication can cause a whole range of issues within a workplace. Discover the consequences of problematic messages between colleagues and tips to improve.
'Ten years of you, my peace and I' - Mosaic Mediation blog
by Emma Jenkings 3 March 2026
Explore how mediation supports mental health in the workplace. Mosaic Mediation reflects on 10 years of conflict resolution and the need to "manage your own peace".
'Communicating without words' - Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 13 November 2025
Non-verbal communication can account for up to 93% of communication. Therefore, it is important to understand the impact of non-verbal communication on interactions.
The Power of Yet - Mosaic Mediation - Man looking at finish line flag.
by Emma Jenkings 17 September 2025
It isn't easy to be in that space between desire and the outcome. Hope is the determining factor that motivates people towards the goal of 'resolution' in mediation.
What a difference a day makes - Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 22 July 2025
Workplace mediation is a process that can make a tangible difference in just one day of mediation. It is the start of resolving issues and improving relationships.
What is underneath the behaviour? - Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 2 June 2025
They say that only a minor amount of communication is verbal - yet what if both non-verbal communication and external behaviours are still only part of the story? This article explores what leads to misunderstandings and miscommunication.
A problem shared... Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 28 April 2025
While gossip can feel good at the time, it rarely makes a beneficial difference to a situation. Conflict coaching is a tool that is becoming more commonly used, as individuals and organise recognise the positive impact only a few conflict coaching sessions have on the individual and the dispute situation.
Show More