Put it in the Past

Emma Jenkings • 17 December 2024

How to find closure without staying stuck in the past

Put it in the past - Mosaic Mediation

Let us start with a quote from my favourite characters from the ‘The Lion King’ film:

Pumbaa: “It's like my buddy Timon always says: you got to put your behind in your past.”

Timon: “No, no no... It's 'You got to put your past behind you.' ”


As we come to the end of one year and look to the start of a new one, you will begin to hear people reflect on the year that has been. Some will focus on all the good, others will consider what they learned from the year’s challenges, some might only see what ‘went wrong’ and others will just want to forget this year and think about next year.


At the start of a workplace mediation, it is common for a party to ask, “But we’re not going to keep digging up the past, are we?” This totally relevant and reasonable question does not come with a clear-cut answer most of the time. They want to 'hakuna matata' the situation away and put the past behind them... but without actually discussing it productively first.


In the years I have studied and specialised in conflict resolution, I have yet to see effective, long-term conflict resolution accomplished by pretending the past did not happen.


The experience we have of someone and our perception of their character and competence impacts the metaphorical ‘lens’ through which we view their words, actions and intentions. We form judgements based on what we believe happened in the past.


However, I think the above question is really asking, “Are we going to stay stuck in the past?”


Whether the process is mediation or conflict coaching, the past is relevant due to how it informs an individual’s mindset. Having said that, it is not constructive to stay focused on the past, because it prevents progress in conflict resolution.


There are several reasons why people might find it hard to put their issues in the past:

1.     The main one in my opinion… The person feels their experience has not been acknowledged.

2.     Believing the other person owes them a sincere apology – they may have received ‘an apology’ but it is likely to bother them still if the apology – or behaviour since - did not seem sincere.

3.     They have not seen behaviour which would have rebuilt trust following a past error.

4.     They find it difficult to trust due to their previous life experience – regardless of the actions of the other person in this scenario.

5.     They do not want to move on.


The final reason may seem a little hopeless and, unfortunately, some people find it really unsettling to change the dynamics of a relationship. I have seen this happen often when someone has become quite wedded to the feeling of being ‘the victim’ in the situation. Resolving the issue necessitates a shift in how they see themselves and the other person. They might also have played a part in the situation, which they do not want to acknowledge.


Trust is a vital part of moving on from a dispute and ‘leaving it in the past’ because conflict resolution is blocked by a lack of trust – or the refusal to extend trust. It may be that someone has apologised but their behaviour does not demonstrate remorse or sustainable improvement, so the person who received their apology is only able to rely on the past negative experience of the person.


Similarly, when someone has experienced damaged trust with other people and has not seen enough effort in conflict resolution, it understandably might lead to a reluctance to extend trust to the other person in the current situation.


The most common reason that I notice for people focusing on the past in conflict coaching and workplace mediation is the sense that their experience has not been listened to or verbally acknowledged; or, that they are still missing out on a sincere apology.


Therefore, even if they have already discussed what happened or the other person has apologised, if they still have a sense that the other person does not fully understand the impact of their actions or value the person’s feelings enough to make changes, the conclusion to those past interactions will not be satisfactory. So, they keep bringing it up!


My approach with clients is to find a middle ground: we do not ignore the past or sweep things under the rug, but we remember that past-related conversations benefit from having a constructive reason behind them.


Sometimes, a conversation about the past becomes circular due to having differing versions of the same event – a very common situation! And, without having a human-interactions version of the ‘VAR’ (a ‘Video Assistant Referee’ in English football) – which I could not see being a positive thing – trying to argue someone into believing your version of what happened when their memory convinces them otherwise does little to move the situation on.


I consider two questions:

1.     “If we do not talk about this, can someone truly move on?”

2.     “If we do talk about this, how is it discussed to enable both individuals to move forward?”


Talking about the past is useful, constructive and peace-making if one or more of the below justifications apply:

-         It offers clarity about the reasoning behind someone’s actions

-         It clears up a misunderstanding

-         It enables greater understanding between people

-         It provides a reference for making wise decisions about the future

-         It helps one or both individuals feel heard and valued – and opens the conversation up to any necessary acknowledgement, apology or clarification.


So, as you look forward to the new year, I invite you to consider how much of the past you choose to take with you and how much you choose to leave behind. Because, regardless of your decision, remember that the past is rarely entirely forgotten and, a difficult situation left unresolved does not go away by itself. And also know that you do not have to manage the situation or find closure about the past on your own.



For more information about how conflict coaching can help process challenging relationships or difficult interactions, and develop conflict management skills, get in touch or learn more about conflict coaching HERE. Emma Jenkings is a trained conflict coach, workplace mediator, SEND mediator, MHFA, DISC practitioner, interpersonal skills trainer, and the founder of Mosaic Mediation.

 

Man looking at a script. Title is 'Difficult Conversations: Should you rehearse first?'
by Emma Jenkings 2 September 2026
We hear it all the time... "the younger generations won't speak on the phone" . (Although, in fairness, I know many an adult across different generations who also avoid phone conversations if they possibly can.) With teenagers of my own, I have thought about this and how far I want to push them to do something that feels uncomfortable. As a SEND mediator, in addition to my workplace mediation practice, I am also very aware that for many young people, the aversion to telephone calls goes beyond slight discomfort requiring upskilling or a confidence boost. I see the benefit of 'live' conversations though. That, unlike with messaging or emails, the speaker has a greater opportunity to convey their intentions and feelings using their tone of voice - body language adds to the communication if involving a videocall or in-person conversation. In my mediator role, I so frequently see small misunderstandings take place that lead to big issues, so anything which lessens the likelihood of that is a positive in my book. Telephone calls are like difficult conversations - people just don't want to have them! Difficult conversations are often avoided because people don't like tension. But, another reason difficult conversations are avoided, just as with telephone calls, is because people are not sure what they will say. Someone may even have tried to hold a tricky yet essential conversation in the past but got thrown off by an unexpected question or response from the other person. Then, this past experience makes them reluctant to go through a similar experience again. The tip I give out the most when people go through coaching due to wanting to be more confident and effective at holding difficult conversations is to prepare for it . Most people need some practice to feel confident on the phone. And in the majority of employed roles that involve a lot of telephone use, a company would provide a script so that any client receives a similar experience, regardless of which individual employee answers the phone. However, some might be concerned that a scripted conversation is likely to feel disingenuous. So, is there anything wrong with rehearsing a conversation beforehand? The last few months, I have done a lot of rehearsing! At the end of this week, I will be delivering my first TedX talk and one of the big challenges with speaking at a 🔴TedX event is to deliver the message without any notes. So, I have been memorising and memorising constantly. At one point, I had done really well at remembering the lines but realised that it sounded 'wooden' and unnatural. I had to take a moment to remember the purpose of what I was saying and how I felt when I first wrote the talk. There is a need - as with many scenarios - to strike a balance between seeming sincere whilst being prepared for a difficult conversation. Depending on the complexity of the conversation, you may find it helpful to prepare in greater detail for that conversation. (You can make use of this planning sheet as a resource . ) There are a few simple principles to consider when preparing for a conversation, so that it comes across as genuine and prepared: Work your way backwards - Take time before the conversation to consider what you want the other person to have heard when they leave. And, what do you want them to do with what they heard? Consider the where, when and how - Timing and context matters. Try to hold a sensitive conversation in a busy place and in a rush and you are unlikely to get a measured response. Have something 'up your sleeve' - Consider a few phrases that you can use during the conversation if you need to pause and process, or if you don't have an answer to a question they ask. This is also potentially helpful if you are going into a conversation with someone who has a particularly authoritative or aggressive communication style; meaning you may need to set boundaries. It is really beneficial to feel confident and clear - and also be genuine - when entering a potentially awkward or difficult conversation. Rehearsal for different outcomes can certainly help with that, especially if you can do that with a someone experienced with navigating such interactions. Simply working through the above three principles means you are likely to feel more prepared regarding what you would like to say, but also how to navigate the conversation when the other person responds too. If you would like coaching support to become a more effective communicator or to manage conflict with confidence, send Mosaic Mediation a message . Emma Jenkings is an accredited mediator, conflict and Peaceful Leadership coach, DISC practitioner, and mediator mentor. You can email any questions or queries to enquiries@mosaicmediation.co.uk .
'Flipping the Drama Triangle' - article by Emma Jenkings, Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 8 July 2026
Find out how the drama triangle roles show up in different scenarios – including the workplace - and how to break out of the roles that lead to conflict escalation.
'Keyboard Chaos: Problematic Communication'. Image: Hand typing on a keyboard.
by Emma Jenkings 18 May 2026
Written communication can cause a whole range of issues within a workplace. Discover the consequences of problematic messages between colleagues and tips to improve.
'Ten years of you, my peace and I' - Mosaic Mediation blog
by Emma Jenkings 3 March 2026
Explore how mediation supports mental health in the workplace. Mosaic Mediation reflects on 10 years of conflict resolution and the need to "manage your own peace".
'Communicating without words' - Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 13 November 2025
Non-verbal communication can account for up to 93% of communication. Therefore, it is important to understand the impact of non-verbal communication on interactions.
The Power of Yet - Mosaic Mediation - Man looking at finish line flag.
by Emma Jenkings 17 September 2025
It isn't easy to be in that space between desire and the outcome. Hope is the determining factor that motivates people towards the goal of 'resolution' in mediation.
What a difference a day makes - Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 22 July 2025
Workplace mediation is a process that can make a tangible difference in just one day of mediation. It is the start of resolving issues and improving relationships.
What is underneath the behaviour? - Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 2 June 2025
They say that only a minor amount of communication is verbal - yet what if both non-verbal communication and external behaviours are still only part of the story? This article explores what leads to misunderstandings and miscommunication.
A problem shared... Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 28 April 2025
While gossip can feel good at the time, it rarely makes a beneficial difference to a situation. Conflict coaching is a tool that is becoming more commonly used, as individuals and organise recognise the positive impact only a few conflict coaching sessions have on the individual and the dispute situation.
Show More