How To Back Down From A Fight!

Emma Jenkings • 30 April 2016

At the outset I should make it clear that there is no upside to NOT dealing with issues . My focus as a mediator is to bring about 'conflict resolution' - this is not a post on 'conflict avoidance'!


Conflict resolution aims to enable people to keep their integrity during a dispute when something is important to them but it also aims to stop them from getting stuck in conflict, under the mistaken belief that backing down is the same as 'giving in'. Time does not ‘heal all wounds’ - at best it may help calm emotions in the SHORT TERM, at worst it reinforces weak points in a relationship.


So, how do you back down from a fight without avoiding the issue?


Firstly, you separate the person from the issue . If you concentrate on the person being the ‘problem’ – you may as well forget the idea of resolving the dispute. People do not respond well to someone telling them they are not good enough (even those who postulate about knowing they ‘are not perfect’). It is valuable to bear in mind that the fight is rarely worth more than the relationship. Even in a work scenario where you may not be particularly concerned about the relationship with the other person; having an inability to get along with people is unlikely to reflect well on you as an employee or manager. Also, the average person spends one third of their whole life at work. Surely, it is better to do what you can to enjoy your time there. Focus on the problem, not the person.


Secondly, when you start from the position that they are ‘wrong’ and you are ‘right’, you raise the defences. As someone who has grown up enjoying debate and winning people over to my way of thinking, I find it totally frustrating if I cannot persuade someone to agree with me. In a class debate this way of thinking is par for the course. In relational disputes, the aim should not be to convince someone else that you are right. If you instead allow for the possibility that there are two sides and that there may be more the story than you realised, you become open to really listening to what the other person is saying.


So… listen – don’t start planning your response while they are talking. Really listen. When someone feels heard they are able to reciprocate. Time and again you will discover that the real issue is not what the argument appeared to be about – more often than not it is about issues of respect, insecurity, trust and feeling hurt. Take the time to explain yourself. You are responsible for effectively communicating what you see as the issue . Assuming anything - such as ‘they knew why I was upset’ - is not an excuse. Communicate.


Stop trying to be tactical . It is seriously petty and inhibits any attempt at resolving things. It amplifies whatever trust issues already exist between you, and let’s face it, people know when someone is not being genuine. Save the tactics for business decisions – it doesn’t work for conflict resolution. Instead, admit when you have been wrong/miscommunicated/need to step up to the mark. Humility creates hugely positive ripple effects – particularly in the area of trust. Without trust, there is little to build on.


Keep the hope alive! It sounds cheesy (and it is) but if there is no hope of even the possibility of resolution, people have no motivation to try. Focus on the points that you both agree on and keep suggesting different options that may help to resolve the issues where there is still difference of opinion. Remember that some solutions may be long-term but once you have determined to do something, you are halfway there – it begins in the mind. At points you may need to agree to disagree, which is fine! The important thing to remember is that you have at least tried to understand the other person’s concerns. Key point: if you do ‘agree to disagree’, you are effectively agreeing to ‘drop’ that issue. Therefore, you should not bring it up again, to them or other people.


When you have found a mutually agreeable solution, be determined to follow through with what you have agreed to and remember that you are not responsible for anyone’s actions but your own. If the other person does not keep to their side of the agreement, you are responsible for how you bring the issue up. Use the above methods because – sociopaths aside - they are highly effective.


If all else fails, bring in a neutral third party. As a Qualified Workplace and Employment Mediator, I highly recommend the use of a mediator to intercede when you are unable to communicate objectively. Mediators are neutral, confidential, and extremely successful at getting to the root of a dispute. So don’t get stuck in conflict and don’t avoid issues – deal with them.


If you need to help with any workplace or employment disputes or conflict, please get in contact via the Contact Page or by emailing emma.jenkings@mosaicmediation.co.uk

Man looking at a script. Title is 'Difficult Conversations: Should you rehearse first?'
by Emma Jenkings 2 September 2026
We hear it all the time... "the younger generations won't speak on the phone" . (Although, in fairness, I know many an adult across different generations who also avoid phone conversations if they possibly can.) With teenagers of my own, I have thought about this and how far I want to push them to do something that feels uncomfortable. As a SEND mediator, in addition to my workplace mediation practice, I am also very aware that for many young people, the aversion to telephone calls goes beyond slight discomfort requiring upskilling or a confidence boost. I see the benefit of 'live' conversations though. That, unlike with messaging or emails, the speaker has a greater opportunity to convey their intentions and feelings using their tone of voice - body language adds to the communication if involving a videocall or in-person conversation. In my mediator role, I so frequently see small misunderstandings take place that lead to big issues, so anything which lessens the likelihood of that is a positive in my book. Telephone calls are like difficult conversations - people just don't want to have them! Difficult conversations are often avoided because people don't like tension. But, another reason difficult conversations are avoided, just as with telephone calls, is because people are not sure what they will say. Someone may even have tried to hold a tricky yet essential conversation in the past but got thrown off by an unexpected question or response from the other person. Then, this past experience makes them reluctant to go through a similar experience again. The tip I give out the most when people go through coaching due to wanting to be more confident and effective at holding difficult conversations is to prepare for it . Most people need some practice to feel confident on the phone. And in the majority of employed roles that involve a lot of telephone use, a company would provide a script so that any client receives a similar experience, regardless of which individual employee answers the phone. However, some might be concerned that a scripted conversation is likely to feel disingenuous. So, is there anything wrong with rehearsing a conversation beforehand? The last few months, I have done a lot of rehearsing! At the end of this week, I will be delivering my first TedX talk and one of the big challenges with speaking at a 🔴TedX event is to deliver the message without any notes. So, I have been memorising and memorising constantly. At one point, I had done really well at remembering the lines but realised that it sounded 'wooden' and unnatural. I had to take a moment to remember the purpose of what I was saying and how I felt when I first wrote the talk. There is a need - as with many scenarios - to strike a balance between seeming sincere whilst being prepared for a difficult conversation. Depending on the complexity of the conversation, you may find it helpful to prepare in greater detail for that conversation. (You can make use of this planning sheet as a resource . ) There are a few simple principles to consider when preparing for a conversation, so that it comes across as genuine and prepared: Work your way backwards - Take time before the conversation to consider what you want the other person to have heard when they leave. And, what do you want them to do with what they heard? Consider the where, when and how - Timing and context matters. Try to hold a sensitive conversation in a busy place and in a rush and you are unlikely to get a measured response. Have something 'up your sleeve' - Consider a few phrases that you can use during the conversation if you need to pause and process, or if you don't have an answer to a question they ask. This is also potentially helpful if you are going into a conversation with someone who has a particularly authoritative or aggressive communication style; meaning you may need to set boundaries. It is really beneficial to feel confident and clear - and also be genuine - when entering a potentially awkward or difficult conversation. Rehearsal for different outcomes can certainly help with that, especially if you can do that with a someone experienced with navigating such interactions. Simply working through the above three principles means you are likely to feel more prepared regarding what you would like to say, but also how to navigate the conversation when the other person responds too. If you would like coaching support to become a more effective communicator or to manage conflict with confidence, send Mosaic Mediation a message . Emma Jenkings is an accredited mediator, conflict and Peaceful Leadership coach, DISC practitioner, and mediator mentor. You can email any questions or queries to enquiries@mosaicmediation.co.uk .
'Flipping the Drama Triangle' - article by Emma Jenkings, Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 8 July 2026
Find out how the drama triangle roles show up in different scenarios – including the workplace - and how to break out of the roles that lead to conflict escalation.
'Keyboard Chaos: Problematic Communication'. Image: Hand typing on a keyboard.
by Emma Jenkings 18 May 2026
Written communication can cause a whole range of issues within a workplace. Discover the consequences of problematic messages between colleagues and tips to improve.
'Ten years of you, my peace and I' - Mosaic Mediation blog
by Emma Jenkings 3 March 2026
Explore how mediation supports mental health in the workplace. Mosaic Mediation reflects on 10 years of conflict resolution and the need to "manage your own peace".
'Communicating without words' - Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 13 November 2025
Non-verbal communication can account for up to 93% of communication. Therefore, it is important to understand the impact of non-verbal communication on interactions.
The Power of Yet - Mosaic Mediation - Man looking at finish line flag.
by Emma Jenkings 17 September 2025
It isn't easy to be in that space between desire and the outcome. Hope is the determining factor that motivates people towards the goal of 'resolution' in mediation.
What a difference a day makes - Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 22 July 2025
Workplace mediation is a process that can make a tangible difference in just one day of mediation. It is the start of resolving issues and improving relationships.
What is underneath the behaviour? - Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 2 June 2025
They say that only a minor amount of communication is verbal - yet what if both non-verbal communication and external behaviours are still only part of the story? This article explores what leads to misunderstandings and miscommunication.
A problem shared... Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 28 April 2025
While gossip can feel good at the time, it rarely makes a beneficial difference to a situation. Conflict coaching is a tool that is becoming more commonly used, as individuals and organise recognise the positive impact only a few conflict coaching sessions have on the individual and the dispute situation.
Show More