Break it Up - How to Have Difficult Conversations

Emma Jenkings • 23 July 2024

Conflict management tips - facilitating a difficult conversation


I don’t like delays. Breaks are fine.


Let me explain my thinking…


As a blanket rule and a conflict resolution tip for the workplace, delays should be avoided as much as possible. The longer a process takes, or the wider the gap between interactions, the more time is available for individuals to embed assumptions and construct theories about the other person in the meantime. (During the delay, they are also inevitably talking to others about the situation and being influenced by their external – and potentially biased - perspectives.)


Our natural state when emotions are heightened and we feel insecure about a relationship, is often to think of all the worst possible scenarios and justifying our actions. So, if you are hoping that people might start giving the other person the benefit of the doubt during the gap, I would think again.


It should also be acknowledged that people feel incredibly uncomfortable while they are waiting for an outcome. Someone’s mind does not stop thinking through a situation, just because the process is requiring them to wait. Without fail, those who were able to resolve issues quickly, were able to come to the mediation with more clarity of mind and less residual stress from the time spent waiting for the mediation to happen.


“Life isn't about living without problems. Life is about solving problems.” - Tom Krause


Those who had been through a drawn-out grievance process or had spent months – or years for some – just trying to get through a situation that was awaiting any form of effective conflict management, are often significantly more drained of emotional energy and more cynical of a positive outcome.


If I were to give a few tips on how to manage conflict, ‘Not delaying resolution’ would be on the list!

 

“We were on a break!”

Though I would not recommend a total ‘break’ in the relationship nor delay in re-establishing communication, there are many potential tools and techniques that I use during a conflict resolution process. And taking a short break is one of them.


So, what is the difference between a ‘delay’ and a ‘break’?


Firstly, the break is short. As I have already highlighted, when there are big gaps between communication, people feel those gaps with their own assumptions, which are often based on biased or missing information. If people need a break, keep it as short as possible.


A delay suggests the next step could reasonably have started earlier.


Secondly, the break has a purpose. I recognise that emotions can sometimes bubble over and lead to people feeling unable to communicate effectively or process information well. If there has been a significantly impactful event, people may need days to process what has occurred. If someone has reached this state during a conversation, it makes total sense to encourage a short break. Even ten minutes can be enough for someone to calm down.


A delay tends to just put off the inevitable necessary action.


Thirdly, the break can have clear boundaries – there is a beginning and an end. If someone needs a break during a mediation session, or if I think it might be useful, I will typically explain what they might want to use the break for and give them a time to return. My experience helps me know how long is likely to be beneficial, so the aim is not to be unnecessarily frugal with time. I do notice that the shorter breaks are helpful for people to encourage a focus on what to do in that time.


A delay tends to be repeatedly extended – often because the situation was not prioritised, or the time allowance was not accurately anticipated.


Finally, a break allows for a reset. I don’t know what happens in each person’s mind when I use a break as a tool, and it looks like a beneficial next step. Yet, when people return, it is interesting to see the difference between how they behaved before and after the break. Many a time I have called for a break when communication has started to become unproductive, they leave heated and return humbly apologetic.


I also believe in acknowledging awkwardness and tension – whether before or after a required break. Learning how to do so sensitively is just one of many essential skills required for resolving conflict. This kind of framing can be help people process what they were experiencing before the break and make a proactive decision about what they want to do next. They are empowered to discuss what happened and then given the choice - “What would you like to happen next?”


A delay, however, keeps people in suspense about the future – over which they often feel out of control.


“Again and again, the impossible problem is solved when we see that the problem is only a tough decision waiting to be made.” - Robert H. Schuller

 

Is a break always necessary?

Every workplace conflict is unique. There is a reason why a key principle of mediation is that the process is flexible. I have no fixed processes when I mediate – every scenario is assessed uniquely, and I am also aware that the way a mediation session evolves is different each time.


A mediation conversation can feel quite intense at times (even if everything is peaceful and positive) so I think short breaks from the conversation can be beneficial anyway, but I am not rigid in my approach to when, why, and how long for.


There may be additional considerations for individuals who have mental health concerns, experience anxiety, are neurodiverse, or have a disability. And, sometimes, even the mediator needs a break too!

 

To break up or not to break up…

I also recommend the person managing the conflict should not fear stopping a conversation for a short break. Some  might be concerned that if they call a break someone may not return. Generally, if you have communicated what will happen after the break, this is very unlikely. If you were to just let a conversation run on, getting more and more heated and unconstructive, then someone may indeed feel the need to leave.



In general, if you think a break is likely to help, I encourage the person managing the conflict situation to consider what the purpose of the break is, what the shortest yet effective interval period would be, and what boundaries they need to communicate.

 

If you would like to develop your conflict resolution skills, receive mentorship from an experienced mediator, or are in need of mediation, training, DISC profiling, or coaching, get in contact by emailing enquiries@mosaicmediation.co.uk . Or you can make an enquiry through the Contact page. Sign up to the Mosaic Mediation newsletter HERE.

 

Man looking at a script. Title is 'Difficult Conversations: Should you rehearse first?'
by Emma Jenkings 2 September 2026
We hear it all the time... "the younger generations won't speak on the phone" . (Although, in fairness, I know many an adult across different generations who also avoid phone conversations if they possibly can.) With teenagers of my own, I have thought about this and how far I want to push them to do something that feels uncomfortable. As a SEND mediator, in addition to my workplace mediation practice, I am also very aware that for many young people, the aversion to telephone calls goes beyond slight discomfort requiring upskilling or a confidence boost. I see the benefit of 'live' conversations though. That, unlike with messaging or emails, the speaker has a greater opportunity to convey their intentions and feelings using their tone of voice - body language adds to the communication if involving a videocall or in-person conversation. In my mediator role, I so frequently see small misunderstandings take place that lead to big issues, so anything which lessens the likelihood of that is a positive in my book. Telephone calls are like difficult conversations - people just don't want to have them! Difficult conversations are often avoided because people don't like tension. But, another reason difficult conversations are avoided, just as with telephone calls, is because people are not sure what they will say. Someone may even have tried to hold a tricky yet essential conversation in the past but got thrown off by an unexpected question or response from the other person. Then, this past experience makes them reluctant to go through a similar experience again. The tip I give out the most when people go through coaching due to wanting to be more confident and effective at holding difficult conversations is to prepare for it . Most people need some practice to feel confident on the phone. And in the majority of employed roles that involve a lot of telephone use, a company would provide a script so that any client receives a similar experience, regardless of which individual employee answers the phone. However, some might be concerned that a scripted conversation is likely to feel disingenuous. So, is there anything wrong with rehearsing a conversation beforehand? The last few months, I have done a lot of rehearsing! At the end of this week, I will be delivering my first TedX talk and one of the big challenges with speaking at a 🔴TedX event is to deliver the message without any notes. So, I have been memorising and memorising constantly. At one point, I had done really well at remembering the lines but realised that it sounded 'wooden' and unnatural. I had to take a moment to remember the purpose of what I was saying and how I felt when I first wrote the talk. There is a need - as with many scenarios - to strike a balance between seeming sincere whilst being prepared for a difficult conversation. Depending on the complexity of the conversation, you may find it helpful to prepare in greater detail for that conversation. (You can make use of this planning sheet as a resource . ) There are a few simple principles to consider when preparing for a conversation, so that it comes across as genuine and prepared: Work your way backwards - Take time before the conversation to consider what you want the other person to have heard when they leave. And, what do you want them to do with what they heard? Consider the where, when and how - Timing and context matters. Try to hold a sensitive conversation in a busy place and in a rush and you are unlikely to get a measured response. Have something 'up your sleeve' - Consider a few phrases that you can use during the conversation if you need to pause and process, or if you don't have an answer to a question they ask. This is also potentially helpful if you are going into a conversation with someone who has a particularly authoritative or aggressive communication style; meaning you may need to set boundaries. It is really beneficial to feel confident and clear - and also be genuine - when entering a potentially awkward or difficult conversation. Rehearsal for different outcomes can certainly help with that, especially if you can do that with a someone experienced with navigating such interactions. Simply working through the above three principles means you are likely to feel more prepared regarding what you would like to say, but also how to navigate the conversation when the other person responds too. If you would like coaching support to become a more effective communicator or to manage conflict with confidence, send Mosaic Mediation a message . Emma Jenkings is an accredited mediator, conflict and Peaceful Leadership coach, DISC practitioner, and mediator mentor. You can email any questions or queries to enquiries@mosaicmediation.co.uk .
'Flipping the Drama Triangle' - article by Emma Jenkings, Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 8 July 2026
Find out how the drama triangle roles show up in different scenarios – including the workplace - and how to break out of the roles that lead to conflict escalation.
'Keyboard Chaos: Problematic Communication'. Image: Hand typing on a keyboard.
by Emma Jenkings 18 May 2026
Written communication can cause a whole range of issues within a workplace. Discover the consequences of problematic messages between colleagues and tips to improve.
'Ten years of you, my peace and I' - Mosaic Mediation blog
by Emma Jenkings 3 March 2026
Explore how mediation supports mental health in the workplace. Mosaic Mediation reflects on 10 years of conflict resolution and the need to "manage your own peace".
'Communicating without words' - Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 13 November 2025
Non-verbal communication can account for up to 93% of communication. Therefore, it is important to understand the impact of non-verbal communication on interactions.
The Power of Yet - Mosaic Mediation - Man looking at finish line flag.
by Emma Jenkings 17 September 2025
It isn't easy to be in that space between desire and the outcome. Hope is the determining factor that motivates people towards the goal of 'resolution' in mediation.
What a difference a day makes - Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 22 July 2025
Workplace mediation is a process that can make a tangible difference in just one day of mediation. It is the start of resolving issues and improving relationships.
What is underneath the behaviour? - Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 2 June 2025
They say that only a minor amount of communication is verbal - yet what if both non-verbal communication and external behaviours are still only part of the story? This article explores what leads to misunderstandings and miscommunication.
A problem shared... Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 28 April 2025
While gossip can feel good at the time, it rarely makes a beneficial difference to a situation. Conflict coaching is a tool that is becoming more commonly used, as individuals and organise recognise the positive impact only a few conflict coaching sessions have on the individual and the dispute situation.
Show More