When is a Manager NOT a Leader?

Emma Jenkings • 10 June 2021

Tips on how to prevent a leader from avoiding issues or micromanaging

What is the difference between a manager who micromanages and a manager who avoids tackling tricky issues? Not that much really. Essentially, both management styles are probably lacking three things: knowledge, skills and confidence in themselves to lead their team effectively.

Why would a manager start micromanaging? 

Often this is due to a lack of trust and confidence – either in themselves being able to manage well, or in their team being able to do their jobs well with management input. So, the micromanaging acts as validation for them and provides a sense of certainty. It will either validate that they are needed or that all the many things they are doing must mean that they are fulfilling their managerial role.

A manager who micromanages will often end up over-complicating a process and their team will sense a lack of trust in them. The manager may repeat the same rhetoric until it loses its purpose or provide more detail than is helpful. Micromanaging also tends to discourage open conversations around ideas and opportunities, and feedback will likely be one-sided. 

Micromanaging can take the form of physically standing over someone while they work but it can also involve unsubstantiated criticism, preventing reasonable autonomous decision-making or having burdensome and unnecessary procedures and methods. 

Yet, equipped with knowledge, skills and confidence, a manager would feel less of a need to control the actions of their team and validate their position.

Why would a manager choose to avoid issues?

Firstly, it may not be a conscious decision. Some people do genuinely feel that many issues resolve themselves, and while this may be true in the minority of cases, often issues are resolved due to a pro-active choice or action taken by individuals. Not just time itself.

Secondly, managers who avoid are often doing so due to fear or a lack of confidence in their ability to tackle the situation successfully – perhaps because they feel ill-equipped to do so. They may find tackling issues with specific members of their team difficult because of the particular communication style or personality of those individuals. Many managers may also wish to avoid doing anything which could have the potential to hurt or offend – though being equipped with advanced communication techniques can prevent this, and instead lead to positive and productive conversations.

A manager who avoids issues is likely to refrain from getting involved in a situation or decision unless compelled to – largely sticking to the ‘simpler’ people management tasks. In teams where a manager is avoiding tackling issues, you are likely to see: performance issues where little to no positive action is taken; disputes or frustration between individuals which is left to ‘resolve itself’; negative feedback being averted at all costs; and there are likely to be ambiguous expectations and boundaries. 

Yet, equipped with knowledge, skills and confidence, a manager would feel more able to step in before issues escalate, be clear about what is expected and be comfortable in giving beneficial feedback.

Most managers that I come across do truly care about the individuals in their team. Many managers want to manage effectively but find it challenging to do so under the weight of responsibility, the pressure of time and not being equipped with the advanced communication and people skills necessary to deal with the daily needs and complexities of people management.

There is a quote from Peter Drucker, which says:
“Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things.”

To me this suggests that leadership is not just about ‘checking the box’ of tasks to be done around management, but on applying the principle of ensuring that what you do as a leader is the right thing to do – for your people, your organisation and you.


Is there just ONE style of good management?


Another obstacle to effective management is the societal stereotype of what a manager should be like. A view that every team, department and organisation would require and benefit from the same type of person – a view which I personally and professionally would heartily disagree with.


And, just as I believe that it is important to not have a fixed view of what a leader looks or acts like, so too do I believe it is important to teach a leader to adapt to the different needs, styles and approaches of their team members too. 


Rather than requiring specific approaches, personality types or standard of experience, instead I would advocate for a leader being equipped with a toolkit of techniques and aiming to operate in line with certain principles of leadership. To have a leader which would be able to effectively lead the specific people in their team, in that organisation.


These techniques could be applied then to the various – and often unique – scenarios that lands on the desk of someone who manages people. They would equip the people manager when dealing with conflict, performance issues, team dynamics, difficult decisions and giving feedback. 


The principles would be around how to care for their team whilst also ensuring that they operate productively too. The three principles that I focused on in my ‘The People Manager’ course are: kindness, clarity and confidence


Based on my experience as a workplace mediator and conflict coach if a leader is kind, then their people will feel supported and able to approach them with questions and concerns. 


If a leader is clear in their communication, then expectations will be clear, conversations will be beneficial and assumptions or misunderstandings will be significantly reduced. 


If a leader is confident, they will feel more able to trust their team and their own judgement; and their team will feel able to rely upon them for guidance.


When a leader is given the tools to adapt to their team members, to manage conflict effectively, and how to effectively apply the principles of being kind, clear and confident, then the risk of them resorting to micro-management or avoiding issues is significantly lessened.


So, if there are managers in your organisation who are stumbling in a few areas of people management, it may be worth identifying whether there are any gaps in their skills, knowledge or confidence. Once identified, productive action can then be taken to develop them as leaders and leave room for the possibility of them actually becoming pretty great at it.


So, in answer to my original question – When is a manager not a leader? – In my experience that would be when they are acting out of fear, uncertainty or unproductive self-validation, rather than being equipped with the skills, knowledge and confidence to do the right thing for their team, their organisation and them.


There are lots of training courses, coaching packages and leadership development tools out there which could be used to equip your people managers. If you are interested in ‘The People Manager: Leading with Kindness, Clarity and Confidence’ as an e-learning or live training course, then click HERE for more details. For more information on the other services that Mosaic Mediation provides to organisations, including mediation, conflict coaching, training and DISC profiling, then click HERE.


Emma Jenkings is a qualified mediator, conflict coach and trainer in communication skills, specialising in workplace disputes. She set up Mosaic Mediation in 2016 for the purpose of helping individuals and organisations have more peaceful, positive and productive relationships.


Man looking at a script. Title is 'Difficult Conversations: Should you rehearse first?'
by Emma Jenkings 2 September 2026
We hear it all the time... "the younger generations won't speak on the phone" . (Although, in fairness, I know many an adult across different generations who also avoid phone conversations if they possibly can.) With teenagers of my own, I have thought about this and how far I want to push them to do something that feels uncomfortable. As a SEND mediator, in addition to my workplace mediation practice, I am also very aware that for many young people, the aversion to telephone calls goes beyond slight discomfort requiring upskilling or a confidence boost. I see the benefit of 'live' conversations though. That, unlike with messaging or emails, the speaker has a greater opportunity to convey their intentions and feelings using their tone of voice - body language adds to the communication if involving a videocall or in-person conversation. In my mediator role, I so frequently see small misunderstandings take place that lead to big issues, so anything which lessens the likelihood of that is a positive in my book. Telephone calls are like difficult conversations - people just don't want to have them! Difficult conversations are often avoided because people don't like tension. But, another reason difficult conversations are avoided, just as with telephone calls, is because people are not sure what they will say. Someone may even have tried to hold a tricky yet essential conversation in the past but got thrown off by an unexpected question or response from the other person. Then, this past experience makes them reluctant to go through a similar experience again. The tip I give out the most when people go through coaching due to wanting to be more confident and effective at holding difficult conversations is to prepare for it . Most people need some practice to feel confident on the phone. And in the majority of employed roles that involve a lot of telephone use, a company would provide a script so that any client receives a similar experience, regardless of which individual employee answers the phone. However, some might be concerned that a scripted conversation is likely to feel disingenuous. So, is there anything wrong with rehearsing a conversation beforehand? The last few months, I have done a lot of rehearsing! At the end of this week, I will be delivering my first TedX talk and one of the big challenges with speaking at a 🔴TedX event is to deliver the message without any notes. So, I have been memorising and memorising constantly. At one point, I had done really well at remembering the lines but realised that it sounded 'wooden' and unnatural. I had to take a moment to remember the purpose of what I was saying and how I felt when I first wrote the talk. There is a need - as with many scenarios - to strike a balance between seeming sincere whilst being prepared for a difficult conversation. Depending on the complexity of the conversation, you may find it helpful to prepare in greater detail for that conversation. (You can make use of this planning sheet as a resource . ) There are a few simple principles to consider when preparing for a conversation, so that it comes across as genuine and prepared: Work your way backwards - Take time before the conversation to consider what you want the other person to have heard when they leave. And, what do you want them to do with what they heard? Consider the where, when and how - Timing and context matters. Try to hold a sensitive conversation in a busy place and in a rush and you are unlikely to get a measured response. Have something 'up your sleeve' - Consider a few phrases that you can use during the conversation if you need to pause and process, or if you don't have an answer to a question they ask. This is also potentially helpful if you are going into a conversation with someone who has a particularly authoritative or aggressive communication style; meaning you may need to set boundaries. It is really beneficial to feel confident and clear - and also be genuine - when entering a potentially awkward or difficult conversation. Rehearsal for different outcomes can certainly help with that, especially if you can do that with a someone experienced with navigating such interactions. Simply working through the above three principles means you are likely to feel more prepared regarding what you would like to say, but also how to navigate the conversation when the other person responds too. If you would like coaching support to become a more effective communicator or to manage conflict with confidence, send Mosaic Mediation a message . Emma Jenkings is an accredited mediator, conflict and Peaceful Leadership coach, DISC practitioner, and mediator mentor. You can email any questions or queries to enquiries@mosaicmediation.co.uk .
'Flipping the Drama Triangle' - article by Emma Jenkings, Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 8 July 2026
Find out how the drama triangle roles show up in different scenarios – including the workplace - and how to break out of the roles that lead to conflict escalation.
'Keyboard Chaos: Problematic Communication'. Image: Hand typing on a keyboard.
by Emma Jenkings 18 May 2026
Written communication can cause a whole range of issues within a workplace. Discover the consequences of problematic messages between colleagues and tips to improve.
'Ten years of you, my peace and I' - Mosaic Mediation blog
by Emma Jenkings 3 March 2026
Explore how mediation supports mental health in the workplace. Mosaic Mediation reflects on 10 years of conflict resolution and the need to "manage your own peace".
'Communicating without words' - Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 13 November 2025
Non-verbal communication can account for up to 93% of communication. Therefore, it is important to understand the impact of non-verbal communication on interactions.
The Power of Yet - Mosaic Mediation - Man looking at finish line flag.
by Emma Jenkings 17 September 2025
It isn't easy to be in that space between desire and the outcome. Hope is the determining factor that motivates people towards the goal of 'resolution' in mediation.
What a difference a day makes - Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 22 July 2025
Workplace mediation is a process that can make a tangible difference in just one day of mediation. It is the start of resolving issues and improving relationships.
What is underneath the behaviour? - Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 2 June 2025
They say that only a minor amount of communication is verbal - yet what if both non-verbal communication and external behaviours are still only part of the story? This article explores what leads to misunderstandings and miscommunication.
A problem shared... Mosaic Mediation
by Emma Jenkings 28 April 2025
While gossip can feel good at the time, it rarely makes a beneficial difference to a situation. Conflict coaching is a tool that is becoming more commonly used, as individuals and organise recognise the positive impact only a few conflict coaching sessions have on the individual and the dispute situation.
Show More